NKJV and 1894 Scrivener Textus Receptus: deviations?
Hi,I'm looking for any verifiable examples where the NKJV translation of the New Testament deviated from the 1894 Scrivener edition of the Greek NT. I'm not looking for disagreements in how the NKJV...
View ArticleRe: NKJV and 1894 Scrivener Textus Receptus: deviations?
Who said the NKJV used Scriveners edition?
View ArticleRe: NKJV and 1894 Scrivener Textus Receptus: deviations?
The NKJV used the H&F Majority Text.
View ArticleRe: NKJV and 1894 Scrivener Textus Receptus: deviations?
I thought they only used it for reference? It obviously has the Johannine Comma.
View ArticleRe: NKJV and 1894 Scrivener Textus Receptus: deviations?
James D. Price, the OT Editor for the NKJV, maintains a website of his most popular research and documents. http://www.jamesdprice.com/newkingjamesversion.html At this link you'll be able to find a...
View ArticleRe: NKJV and 1894 Scrivener Textus Receptus: deviations?
mko wrote:I thought they only used it for reference? It obviously has the Johannine Comma.Yes, my bad. Call it a Freudian slip if you like, as I have Farstad's book The New King James Version on my...
View ArticleRe: NKJV and 1894 Scrivener Textus Receptus: deviations?
redgreen5 wrote: The Publisher's forward to the NKJV states: "the Scrivener Greek Text was the basis of the New Testament." Thank you!
View Article
